Risinger v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

W.D. Washington

Risinger v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

DecidedFebruary 13, 2024

Docket2:23-cv-00435

StatusUnknown

This text of Risinger v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Risinger v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Risinger v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, (W.D. Wash. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2

3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 JASON RISINGER, 7 Plaintiff, 8 v. C23-0435 TSZ 9 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; and OHIO SECURITY MINUTE ORDER 10 INSURANCE COMPANY, 11 Defendants.

12 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: 13 (1) The parties’ stipulated motion for a protective order, docket no. 39, is 14 GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The parties’ proposed protective order departs from the District’s Model Stipulated Protective Order without explanation or submission 15 of the requisite redlined version. See Local Civil Rule 26(c)(2). The Court will separately enter a protective order that more closely tracks the District’s model order. 16 (2) With regard to the filing of materials designated as “confidential,” the 17 following process shall apply. Counsel shall meet and confer before filing documents under seal. To the extent possible, counsel shall submit, along with any document filed 18 under seal, a stipulation and proposed order reciting the reasons for sealing the document. See Local Civil Rule 5(g); Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th 19 Cir. 2006); Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2003). If counsel cannot reach agreement, then a motion to seal must be filed contemporaneously 20 with the sealed document. If the party wishing to submit the material is not the party designating the material as confidential, the party wishing to submit the material shall 21 provide at least seven (7) days’ notice to the other party(ies), so that a motion to seal, if necessary, may be prepared and filed by the party designating the material as confidential 22 at the same time as the material is submitted under seal to the Court. 1 (3) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of record. 2 Dated this 13th day of February, 2024. 3 Ravi Subramanian 4 Clerk 5 s/Laurie Cuaresma Deputy Clerk 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2

3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 JASON RISINGER, 7 Plaintiff, 8 v. C23-0435 TSZ 9 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; and OHIO SECURITY MINUTE ORDER 10 INSURANCE COMPANY, 11 Defendants.

12 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: 13 (1) The parties’ stipulated motion for a protective order, docket no. 39, is 14 GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The parties’ proposed protective order departs from the District’s Model Stipulated Protective Order without explanation or submission 15 of the requisite redlined version. See Local Civil Rule 26(c)(2). The Court will separately enter a protective order that more closely tracks the District’s model order. 16 (2) With regard to the filing of materials designated as “confidential,” the 17 following process shall apply. Counsel shall meet and confer before filing documents under seal. To the extent possible, counsel shall submit, along with any document filed 18 under seal, a stipulation and proposed order reciting the reasons for sealing the document. See Local Civil Rule 5(g); Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th 19 Cir. 2006); Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2003). If counsel cannot reach agreement, then a motion to seal must be filed contemporaneously 20 with the sealed document. If the party wishing to submit the material is not the party designating the material as confidential, the party wishing to submit the material shall 21 provide at least seven (7) days’ notice to the other party(ies), so that a motion to seal, if necessary, may be prepared and filed by the party designating the material as confidential 22 at the same time as the material is submitted under seal to the Court. 1 (3) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of record. 2 Dated this 13th day of February, 2024. 3 Ravi Subramanian 4 Clerk 5 s/Laurie Cuaresma Deputy Clerk 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

Debbie Foltz, Consumer Action United Policyholders Texas Watch, Intervenors, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, April J. Ho Jim Mathis Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors, and Consumer Action United Policy-Holders Texas Watch, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and Steven Becker

331 F.3d 1122 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Risinger v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/risinger-v-liberty-mutual-insurance-company-wawd-2024.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack