Risi v. Rowe Industries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Risi v. Rowe Industries, Inc.

57 A.D.2d 947, 394 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12222

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 31, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 57 A.D.2d 947 (Risi v. Rowe Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Risi v. Rowe Industries, Inc., 57 A.D.2d 947, 394 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12222 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 10, 1977, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to increase the ad damnum clause for the personal injuries sustained by Thomas J. Risi. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The injured plaintiff, a husband and father of three children, was 31 years old at the time of the accident. As a result of the accident, he is permanently brain damaged and disabled. This application was made sufficiently in advance of trial so as to result in no prejudice to appellants. The increase in the ad damnum clause is warranted on the medical proof as to the cause and the now ascertainable extent of the injuries. Martuscello, J. P., Cohalan, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 10, 1977, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to increase the ad damnum clause for the personal injuries sustained by Thomas J. Risi. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The injured plaintiff, a husband and father of three children, was 31 years old at the time of the accident. As a result of the accident, he is permanently brain damaged and disabled. This application was made sufficiently in advance of trial so as to result in no prejudice to appellants. The increase in the ad damnum clause is warranted on the medical proof as to the cause and the now ascertainable extent of the injuries. Martuscello, J. P., Cohalan, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A.D.2d 947, 394 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/risi-v-rowe-industries-inc-nyappdiv-1977.