Rishebarger v. Stockwell-Kling Corporation

California Court of Appeal

Rishebarger v. Stockwell-Kling Corporation

17 P.2d 204, 128 Cal. App. 779

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedDecember 14, 1932

DocketDocket No. 8664.

StatusPublished

This text of 17 P.2d 204 (Rishebarger v. Stockwell-Kling Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rishebarger v. Stockwell-Kling Corporation, 17 P.2d 204, 128 Cal. App. 779 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM CASES. [1] The facts in this case and the questions involved are identical with those in the case of Iske v. Stockwell-KlingCorp., ante, p. 192 [17 P.2d 203], this day filed, and for the reasons therein stated the appeal in this case is dismissed.

Works, P.J., and Stephens, J., pro tem., concurred.

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on February 9, 1933. *Page 780

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM CASES. [1] The facts in this case and the questions involved are identical with those in the case of Iske v. Stockwell-KlingCorp., ante, p. 192 [17 P.2d 203], this day filed, and for the reasons therein stated the appeal in this case is dismissed.

Works, P.J., and Stephens, J., pro tem., concurred.

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on February 9, 1933. *Page 780

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 P.2d 204, 128 Cal. App. 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rishebarger-v-stockwell-kling-corporation-calctapp-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack