Rishebarger v. Stockwell-Kling Corporation

California Court of Appeal

Rishebarger v. Stockwell-Kling Corporation

17 P.2d 204, 128 Cal. App. 779

California Court of Appeal·Decided December 14, 1932·No. Docket No. 8664.·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM CASES. [1] The facts in this case and the questions involved are identical with those in the case of Iske v. Stockwell-KlingCorp., ante, p. 192 [17 P.2d 203], this day filed, and for the reasons therein stated the appeal in this case is dismissed.

Works, P.J., and Stephens, J., pro tem., concurred.

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on February 9, 1933. *Page 780

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM CASES. [1] The facts in this case and the questions involved are identical with those in the case of Iske v. Stockwell-KlingCorp., ante, p. 192 [17 P.2d 203], this day filed, and for the reasons therein stated the appeal in this case is dismissed.

Works, P.J., and Stephens, J., pro tem., concurred.

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on February 9, 1933. *Page 780

Rishebarger v. Stockwell-Kling Corporation, 17 P.2d 204, 128 Cal. App. 779 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

17 P.2d 204 (Rishebarger v. Stockwell-Kling Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related