Rishebarger v. Stockwell-Kling Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Rishebarger v. Stockwell-Kling Corp.

128 Cal. App. 779

California Court of Appeal·Decided December 14, 1932·No. Civ. No. 8664·Published

Opinion

THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.

The facts in this case and the questions involved are identical with those in the case of Iske v. Stoclcwell-Kling Corp., ante, p. 192 [17 Pac. (2d) 203], this day filed, and for the reasons therein stated the appeal in this case is dismissed.

Works, P. J., and Stephens, J., pro tem., concurred.

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on February 9, 1933.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.

The facts in this case and the questions involved are identical with those in the case of Iske v. Stoclcwell-Kling Corp., ante, p. 192 [17 Pac. (2d) 203], this day filed, and for the reasons therein stated the appeal in this case is dismissed.

Works, P. J., and Stephens, J., pro tem., concurred.

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on February 9, 1933.

Rishebarger v. Stockwell-Kling Corp., 128 Cal. App. 779 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

128 Cal. App. 779 (Rishebarger v. Stockwell-Kling Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related