Risen Energy Co. v. United States

2024 CIT 144
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Risen Energy Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 665 F. Supp. 3d 1335
United States Court of International Trade·Decided December 18, 2024·No. 23-00153·Published

Opinion

Slip Op. 24-144

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

RISEN ENERGY CO., LTD., Plaintiff, v. Before: Jane A. Restani, Judge UNITED STATES, Defendant, Court No. 23-00153 and AMERICAN ALLIANCE FOR SOLAR MANUFACTURING, Defendant-Intervenor.

JUDGMENT

This matter is before the Court after remand to reconsider and, if necessary, recalculate the

portion of the countervailing duty (“CVD”) rate attributable to the Export Buyer’s Credit Program

(“EBCP”). The Court’s opinion ordering remand permitted the United States Department of

Commerce (“Commerce”) to choose among several avenues to resolve the matter. It chose to

delete the entire amount attributable to EBCP from the CVD rate. This was consistent with the

Court’s remand opinion. As no party has submitted comments on the remand determination, it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the remand results by Commerce are

SUSTAINED.

/s/ Jane A. Restani Jane A. Restani, Judge

Dated: December 18, 2024 New York, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Risen Energy Co. v. United States, 2024 CIT 144 (cit 2024).

2024 CIT 144 (Risen Energy Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.