Home/U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California/Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works v. Trent

Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works v. Trent

92 F. 375, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2973
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California
DecidedJanuary 23, 1899
DocketNo. 12,293
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 92 F. 375 (Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works v. Trent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works v. Trent, 92 F. 375, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2973 (circtndca 1899).

Opinion

MORROW, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit for the infringement of letters patent No. 538,884, dated May 7,1895, for an ore crusher. The inventor was August H. Schierholz, whose application for the patent was filed in the patent office February 5, 1895. By an assignment made after the application, and before the granting of the letters patent, Schierholz transferred all the property in the invention to the complainant.

The invention relates to improvements in ore-crushing machines, in which crushing rolls are caused to travel within the circumference of a pan, upon suitable dies arranged around the periphery, and which have a fixed central post, and consists of novel means for driving the rolls, and allowing for the irregularities of movement caused by the ore over which the rolls pass, without interfering with the vertical shaft or its gear and connections. The details of construction are explained by reference to the accompanying drawings:

[376]*376

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leesona Corp. v. Cotwool Manufacturing Corp.
201 F. Supp. 472 (W.D. South Carolina, 1962)
Conmar Products Corporation v. Tibony
63 F. Supp. 372 (E.D. New York, 1945)
American Voting Mach. Corp. v. City of New York
2 F. Supp. 191 (S.D. New York, 1933)
Individual Drinking Cup Co. v. Errett
297 F. 733 (Second Circuit, 1924)
Murphy Wall Bed Co. v. Rip Van Winkle Wall Bed Co.
295 F. 748 (N.D. California, 1923)
Zittlosen Mfg. Co. v. Boss
219 F. 887 (Eighth Circuit, 1914)
Shakespeare v. Enterprise Mfg. Co.
211 F. 477 (N.D. Ohio, 1913)
Star Bucket Pump Co. v. Butler Mfg. Co.
198 F. 857 (W.D. Missouri, 1912)
Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. v. Republic Rubber Co.
195 F. 768 (N.D. Illinois, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 F. 375, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/risdon-iron-locomotive-works-v-trent-circtndca-1899.