Rippo v. McDaniel
This text of Rippo v. McDaniel (Rippo v. McDaniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA te OK OK 9 10 Michael Damon Rippo, Case No. 2:07-cv-00507-APG-VCF Petitioner, 11 v. ORDER 12 13 William Gittere, et al., Respondents. 14 15 16 In this capital habeas corpus proceeding, petitioner Michael Rippo has filed a notice of 17 || voluntary dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). ECF No. 90. Respondents have not 18 || filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment, so the notice must be given effect. See Am. 19 || Soccer Co. vy. Score First Enterprises, a Div. of Kevlar Indus., 187 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 20 |} 1999). 21 I THEREFORE ORDER this case dismissed without prejudice. 22 DATED THIS 23" day of February, 2021. 23 24 ¢ LA ANDREW P. GORDON 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rippo v. McDaniel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rippo-v-mcdaniel-nvd-2021.