Ripley v. State
580 So. 2d 895, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6306, 1991 WL 104648
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 19, 1991·No. No. 90-1226·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Appellant’s conviction is affirmed. However, we must remand to correct the sentencing order to conform the written judgment and sentence for the D.U.I. conviction to the oral pronouncement of sentence. Kord v. State, 508 So.2d 758 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). At trial the court ordered appellant to perform fifty hours of community service. However the sentencing order recites “50 hours community control.” The sentence should be corrected to reflect accurately “50 hours of community service.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ripley v. State, 580 So. 2d 895, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6306, 1991 WL 104648 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
580 So. 2d 895 (Ripley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ruzzi v. State
637 So. 2d 87 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Jones v. State
610 So. 2d 745 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)