Ripley v. State

580 So. 2d 895, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6306, 1991 WL 104648
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 19, 1991
DocketNo. 90-1226
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 580 So. 2d 895 (Ripley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ripley v. State, 580 So. 2d 895, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6306, 1991 WL 104648 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s conviction is affirmed. However, we must remand to correct the sentencing order to conform the written judgment and sentence for the D.U.I. conviction to the oral pronouncement of sentence. Kord v. State, 508 So.2d 758 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). At trial the court ordered appellant to perform fifty hours of community service. However the sentencing order recites “50 hours community control.” The sentence should be corrected to reflect accurately “50 hours of community service.”

HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ruzzi v. State
637 So. 2d 87 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Jones v. State
610 So. 2d 745 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
580 So. 2d 895, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6306, 1991 WL 104648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ripley-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.