Ripley v. Morris

Illinois Supreme Court

Ripley v. Morris

7 Ill. 381

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 15, 1845

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 7 Ill. 381 (Ripley v. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ripley v. Morris, 7 Ill. 381 (Ill. 1845).

Pincite

Opinion

The Opinion of the Court was delivered by

Lockwood, J.

The motion is granted. A Writ,of Error, like a Scire Facias, is considered as a new action. 2 Tidd’s Pr. 1141; and the statute relative to costs requires the Court to dismiss the suit, whenever a non-resident commences an action, either in the Circuit or Supreme Court, without filing security for the costs.

Dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff in error.

Motion alloived.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Opinion of the Court was delivered by

Lockwood, J.

The motion is granted. A Writ,of Error, like a Scire Facias, is considered as a new action. 2 Tidd’s Pr. 1141; and the statute relative to costs requires the Court to dismiss the suit, whenever a non-resident commences an action, either in the Circuit or Supreme Court, without filing security for the costs.

Dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff in error.

Motion alloived.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Ill. 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ripley-v-morris-ill-1845.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack