Ripley v. Morris

Illinois Supreme Court

Ripley v. Morris

7 Ill. 381

Illinois Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1845·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

The Opinion of the Court was delivered by

Lockwood, J.

The motion is granted. A Writ,of Error, like a Scire Facias, is considered as a new action. 2 Tidd’s Pr. 1141; and the statute relative to costs requires the Court to dismiss the suit, whenever a non-resident commences an action, either in the Circuit or Supreme Court, without filing security for the costs.

Dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff in error.

Motion alloived.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Opinion of the Court was delivered by

Lockwood, J.

The motion is granted. A Writ,of Error, like a Scire Facias, is considered as a new action. 2 Tidd’s Pr. 1141; and the statute relative to costs requires the Court to dismiss the suit, whenever a non-resident commences an action, either in the Circuit or Supreme Court, without filing security for the costs.

Dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff in error.

Motion alloived.

Ripley v. Morris, 7 Ill. 381 (Ill. 1845).

Pincite

7 Ill. 381 (Ripley v. Morris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related