Ripley v. Jaussen
29 N.Y.S. 1148, 9 Misc. 474, 61 N.Y. St. Rep. 121
This text of 29 N.Y.S. 1148 (Ripley v. Jaussen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ripley v. Jaussen, 29 N.Y.S. 1148, 9 Misc. 474, 61 N.Y. St. Rep. 121 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).
Opinion
Error, merely, does not suffice to support an appeal. To authorize a reversal, the error must have operated prejudicially to the appellant. No possible prejudice here resulted from the judgment rendered, for it merely accomplished what appellant was concededly willing to have occur at the time of the trial. The order must be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Equitable Gaslight Co. v. French
31 N.Y.S. 812 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1895)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
29 N.Y.S. 1148, 9 Misc. 474, 61 N.Y. St. Rep. 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ripley-v-jaussen-nyctcompl-1894.