Ripley v. Jaussen

29 N.Y.S. 1148, 9 Misc. 474, 61 N.Y. St. Rep. 121
New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided August 1, 1894·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Error, merely, does not suffice to support an appeal. To authorize a reversal, the error must have operated prejudicially to the appellant. No possible prejudice here resulted from the judgment rendered, for it merely accomplished what appellant was concededly willing to have occur at the time of the trial. The order must be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ripley v. Jaussen, 29 N.Y.S. 1148, 9 Misc. 474, 61 N.Y. St. Rep. 121 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

29 N.Y.S. 1148 (Ripley v. Jaussen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Equitable Gaslight Co. v. French
31 N.Y.S. 812 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1895)