Ripley Leslie v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 10, 2010·No. 10-10-00177-CR·Published

Opinion

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

 

No. 10-10-00177-CR

Ripley Leslie,

                                                                                    Appellant

 v.

The State of Texas,

                                                                                    Appellee


From the 52nd District Court

Coryell County, Texas

Trial Court No. FO-06-18465

memorandum opinion

We abated this case to the trial court to hold a hearing and to determine why Appellant’s Brief had not been filed.  In the hearing, held on October 1, 2010, Appellant stated on the record that he wished to abandon his appeal.

We invoke Rule 2 to suspend the motion requirement in Rule 42.2(a).  See Tex. R. App. P. 2, 42.2(a); Hendrix v. State, 86 S.W.3d 762, 762 & n.1 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, no pet.).  Appellant has clearly stated his desire to abandon his appeal.  Accordingly, his appeal is dismissed.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed November 10, 2010

Do not publish

[CR25]


y">                                                                                                                          PER CURIAM


Before Chief Justice Thomas,

          Justice Cummings, and

          Justice Vance

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed December 15, 1993

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ripley Leslie v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Ripley Leslie v. State (Ripley Leslie v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hendrix v. State
86 S.W.3d 762 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)