Riper v. Tunison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Riper v. Tunison

248 A.D. 852, 291 N.Y.S. 147, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7635

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 9, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 852 (Riper v. Tunison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Riper v. Tunison, 248 A.D. 852, 291 N.Y.S. 147, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting defendant’s motion for a stay of all proceedings until arbitration has been had, directing the appointment of arbitrators, and extending defendant’s time to plead or otherwise move with respect to the amended complaint unanimously modified by striking out the provision for the appointment of an arbitrator and without prejudice to the right to proceed under the Arbitration Law as in a special proceeding, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Order entered on a motion by plaintiff for an order authorizing her to conduct the business of the partnership during the pendency of action, or appointing a receiver pendente lite unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting defendant’s motion for a stay of all proceedings until arbitration has been had, directing the appointment of arbitrators, and extending defendant’s time to plead or otherwise move with respect to the amended complaint unanimously modified by striking out the provision for the appointment of an arbitrator and without prejudice to the right to proceed under the Arbitration Law as in a special proceeding, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Order entered on a motion by plaintiff for an order authorizing her to conduct the business of the partnership during the pendency of action, or appointing a receiver pendente lite unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 852, 291 N.Y.S. 147, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riper-v-tunison-nyappdiv-1936.