Rios v. Reid

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedMarch 22, 2010
DocketI.C. NOS. 891561 PH-2090.
StatusPublished

This text of Rios v. Reid (Rios v. Reid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rios v. Reid, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2010).

Opinion

***********
The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Rideout and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or rehear the parties. The Full Commission AFFIRMS the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Rideout, with modifications, and enters the following Opinion and Award:

***********
Based upon all of the competent evidence of record and reasonable inferences flowing therefrom, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. At the time of the hearing of this matter before the Deputy Commissioner, Plaintiff was a 22 year-old male who resided in Fayetteville, North Carolina. Plaintiff had completed elementary school in his home country of Honduras. Plaintiff has worked as a gas station cashier and a sales agent in Honduras and has worked construction in North Carolina.

2. Defendant Turner Construction Company ("Defendant Turner") is a construction management firm. Defendant Turner and Cape Fear Valley Health System entered into a contract on 7 April 2005 for the construction of a pavilion and parking deck at Cape Fear Valley Health System ("Cape Fear site"). Defendant Turner entered into an agreement on 11 August 2006 with a subcontractor, Defendant BJL Construction, Inc. ("Defendant BJL") to perform work and furnish labor for the Cape Fear site. Defendant BJL entered into an agreement with Defendant Lance Reid d/b/a Fame Cleaning Services ("Defendant Reid") on or about July 2006 *Page 3 to provide and employ one skilled laborer, one unskilled laborer, and a hoist operator for the Cape Fear site.

3. Plaintiff learned of a position at the Cape Fear site from Silvino Romo ("Mr. Romo"), an hourly employee of Defendant Turner. Mr. Romo told Defendant Turner that he had a friend who could work at the Cape Fear site as a helper. Mr. Romo brought Plaintiff to the Cape Fear site and Plaintiff began to work as a helper. Plaintiff met Defendant Reid about one week after he started working at the site. Thereafter, Plaintiff only saw Defendant Reid on the worksite on pay day, which was every other week. Defendant Reid paid Plaintiff $10.00 per hour and his average weekly wage was $600.00 per week.

4. Plaintiff's job as a helper required him to work everyday with Defendant Turner employees. Plaintiff's job was to help Defendant Turner employees with their daily tasks. Plaintiff received his work instructions from Mr. Romo. Mr. Romo provided Plaintiff with his daily job tasks. Mr. Romo, an employee of Defendant Turner, "provided direction" to Plaintiff.

5. Defendant Reid did not spend time at the Cape Fear job site because Defendant Turner told him that he did not need to be on the site. Defendant Turner told him that its supervisors would manage Defendant Reid's employees. Defendant Reid described Defendant Turner supervisors as wanting to "micro-manage."

6. On 20 December 2007, Defendant Reid employed Plaintiff, Vanessa Periman and James Smith.

7. By Defendant Reid's own admission, on 20 December 2007 and at all relevant times, Defendant Reid did not have a workers' compensation insurance policy to cover his employees at the Cape Fear site. *Page 4

8. After contracting with Defendant Reid to employ a skilled laborer, an unskilled laborer, and a hoist operator for the Cape Fear site in July 2006, Defendant BJL never obtained from Defendant Reid a certificate of insurance that included workers' compensation insurance coverage.

9. The greater weight of the evidence shows that the work being done by Plaintiff at the Cape Fear site was essentially that of Defendant Turner, who had a general contract with Cape Fear Valley Health System to manage the construction of the pavilion and parking deck.

10. The greater weight of the evidence shows that Defendant Turner, as the entity in charge of managing the construction project at the Cape Fear site, had the right to control the details of the work at the Cape Fear site and Defendant Turner exercised that control.

11. The greater weight of the evidence shows that Defendant Reid was a general employer of Plaintiff who loaned Plaintiff to Defendant Turner, thereby making Defendant Turner a special employer of Plaintiff.

12. The greater weight of the evidence shows that Plaintiff and Defendant Turner had an implied contract where Plaintiff accepted the work assignment from Defendant Turner and Plaintiff performed the work under the supervision, and at the direction, of Defendant Turner.

13. On 20 December 2007, Plaintiff was working on the second floor of the building on the Cape Fear site. He went down to the first floor to gather some tools and when he reached the first floor, he felt "like a pipe, a heavy pipe" hit him on the head and he lost consciousness. Plaintiff's next memory is of waking up in the hospital.

14. Cumberland County EMS arrived at the Cape Fear site. Plaintiff had been hit on the head by a 15 pound plastic roll that had been thrown from the fourth floor window. Plaintiff was unconscious when EMS arrived. *Page 5

15. Plaintiff was having severe neck and back pain. Plaintiff was taken to the emergency department of Cape Fear Valley Health System, where he was diagnosed with a head injury and a neck injury. Plaintiff was given Morphine for bilateral shoulder pain. The hospital was unable to obtain a social history due to his condition. Plaintiff had mild disc bulging at multiple levels in the mid and lower cervical spine and evidence of cervical muscle spasm. Plaintiff was prescribed Percocet and Cyclobenzaprine and instructed to follow up with a workers' compensation doctor in 2-3 days. Defendant Reid, Mr. Romo, and Defendant Turner's safety manager, Gaylord Ballard, came to check on Plaintiff in the hospital.

16. Plaintiff returned to the emergency department on 21 January 2008 with neck pain, muscle spasms, and a headache. Plaintiff was prescribed Baclofen and Vicodin. Plaintiff was referred to David Kishbaugh, D.O., and advised to follow up with a rehabilitation doctor for chronic neck pain. Through a translator, the hospital "staff attempted to make a [follow up appointment] with Dr. Kishbaugh, but [the] office require[d] authorization from workers' comp. [Plaintiff did] not understand this. [He was] advised to give employer the work note, then to take hospital bill to employer when it arrives, so he can file for workers' comp."

17. Plaintiff gave the hospital instructions to Mr. Romo, who gave the note to Mr. Ballard. Plaintiff did not give the note to Defendant Reid because Mr. Reid was seldom at the job site.

18. Mr. Ballard sent Plaintiff to U.S. Healthworks on 23 January 2008. Plaintiff had constant daily headaches, nervousness and confusion, and was unsure if he was having memory problems. He also had left sided neck pain. Plaintiff had been working his regular job, but was unable to continue. Plaintiff was restricted in the range of motion of his neck. Plaintiff also had arm numbness and tingling, neck pain with motion and restricted motion. Plaintiff was *Page 6 instructed to stop his medications from the emergency room and was provided prescriptions for Cyclobenzaprine and Naproxen. He was instructed, through an interpreter, to return to the clinic in 3 days. He was given lifting restrictions of no lifting more than 10 pounds and no reaching or overhead work.

19. When Plaintiff returned to U.S.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Collins v. James Paul Edwards, Inc.
204 S.E.2d 873 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1974)
Russell v. Lowes Product Distribution
425 S.E.2d 454 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1993)
Brown v. Friday Services, Inc.
460 S.E.2d 356 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rios v. Reid, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rios-v-reid-ncworkcompcom-2010.