Rios v. New York State Board of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rios v. New York State Board of Parole

269 A.D.2d 713, 704 N.Y.S.2d 895, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2068

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 24, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 269 A.D.2d 713 (Rios v. New York State Board of Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rios v. New York State Board of Parole, 269 A.D.2d 713, 704 N.Y.S.2d 895, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2068 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Cobb, J.), entered June 8, 1999 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition for lack of personal jurisdiction.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a determination of respondent denying him parole. Supreme Court dismissed the proceeding on the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction. Since petitioner failed to serve respondent and the Attorney General in accordance with the directive set forth in the amended order to show cause, the petition was properly dismissed (see, Matter of Seifert v Selsky, 260 AD2d 823) and we are precluded from addressing the merits of the petition.

Cardona, P. J., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Cobb, J.), entered June 8, 1999 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition for lack of personal jurisdiction.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a determination of respondent denying him parole. Supreme Court dismissed the proceeding on the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction. Since petitioner failed to serve respondent and the Attorney General in accordance with the directive set forth in the amended order to show cause, the petition was properly dismissed (see, Matter of Seifert v Selsky, 260 AD2d 823) and we are precluded from addressing the merits of the petition.

Cardona, P. J., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 A.D.2d 713, 704 N.Y.S.2d 895, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rios-v-new-york-state-board-of-parole-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack