Rios v. Mitev

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rios v. Mitev

112 A.D.3d 905, 976 N.Y.S.2d 883

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 26, 2013·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lewis, J.), dated November 9, 2012, as denied their motion to transfer venue of the action from Kings County to Richmond County pursuant to CPLR 510 and 511.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendants’ untimely motion to transfer venue of the action from Kings County to Richmond County pursuant to CPLR 510 and 511 (see Joyner-Pack v Sykes, 30 AD3d 469, 469 [2006]). Mastro, J.E, Balkin, Sgroi and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lewis, J.), dated November 9, 2012, as denied their motion to transfer venue of the action from Kings County to Richmond County pursuant to CPLR 510 and 511.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendants’ untimely motion to transfer venue of the action from Kings County to Richmond County pursuant to CPLR 510 and 511 (see Joyner-Pack v Sykes, 30 AD3d 469, 469 [2006]). Mastro, J.E, Balkin, Sgroi and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Rios v. Mitev, 112 A.D.3d 905, 976 N.Y.S.2d 883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

112 A.D.3d 905 (Rios v. Mitev) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related