Rios v. Mitev
This text of 112 A.D.3d 905 (Rios v. Mitev) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lewis, J.), dated November 9, 2012, as denied their motion to transfer venue of the action from Kings County to Richmond County pursuant to CPLR 510 and 511.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendants’ untimely motion to transfer venue of the action from Kings County to Richmond County pursuant to CPLR 510 and 511 (see Joyner-Pack v Sykes, 30 AD3d 469, 469 [2006]). Mastro, J.E, Balkin, Sgroi and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 A.D.3d 905, 976 N.Y.S.2d 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rios-v-mitev-nyappdiv-2013.