Rios v. Holder
This text of 362 F. App'x 815 (Rios v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Pedro Gilberto Rios, a native and citizen of Nicaragua, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order terminating deportation proceedings. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the petition because the IJ’s August 29, 2005, or *816 der was not a final order of deportation. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101(a)(47)(A), 1252(b)(9).
To the extent Rios challenges the March 10,1987, final deportation order, we lack jurisdiction to consider it because this petition for review is not timely as to that order. See Singh v. INS, 315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir.2003).
We lack jurisdiction to consider Rios’ ineffective assistance of counsel contention because he failed to exhaust that issue before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
362 F. App'x 815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rios-v-holder-ca9-2010.