Rios v. Bull City Financial Solutions, Inc.

District Court, W.D. North Carolina·Decided June 7, 2024·No. 3:24-cv-00014·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:24-cv-14-MOC-SCR MILTON RIOS, pro se, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ORDER ) BULL CITY FINANCIAL ) SOLUTIONS, INC., ) NATIONAL CREDIT SYSTEMS, INC., _) ) Defendant. ) __) THIS MATTER comes before the Court on a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint, filed by Defendant. (Doc. No. 3). Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint on March 7, 2024. (Doc. No. 10). Because Plaintiff has filed an Amended Complaint, the pending motion to dismiss the original Complaint is moot. See Young v. City of Mount Ranier, 238 F.3d 567, 573 (4th Cir. 2001) (“The general rule ... is that an amended pleading supersedes the original pleading, rendering the original pleading of no effect.”); Turner v. Kight, 192 F. Supp. 2d 391, 397 (D. Md. 2002) (denying as moot motions to dismiss original complaint on grounds that amended complaint superseded original complaint). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. No. 3), is DENIED as moot. Signed: June 7, 2024

astevrnna Max O, Cogburn Ji United States District Judge Tog it

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rios v. Bull City Financial Solutions, Inc., (W.D.N.C. 2024).

Rios v. Bull City Financial Solutions, Inc. (Rios v. Bull City Financial Solutions, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Turner v. Kight
192 F. Supp. 2d 391 (D. Maryland, 2002)
Young v. City of Mount Ranier
238 F.3d 567 (Fourth Circuit, 2001)