Rios v. Adkins
This text of 114 F. App'x 591 (Rios v. Adkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jimmy Dean Rios appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rios v. First Health Montgomery Mem. Hosp., No. CA-03-274-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 9 & June 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
114 F. App'x 591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rios-v-adkins-ca4-2004.