Rios, Abel
This text of Rios, Abel (Rios, Abel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-91,409-01
EX PARTE ABEL RIOS, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 20040D00922-210-1 IN THE 210TH DISTRICT COURT FROM EL PASO COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of injury to a child with intent to cause serious bodily injury with
a deadly weapon and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Eighth Court of Appeals affirmed his
conviction. Rios v. State, No. 08-06-00211-CR (Tex. Crim. App.—El Paso, Sept. 24, 2008).
Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the
district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Over eleven years after Applicant learned that his conviction had been affirmed on direct
appeal, he contends that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to timely inform him of his
right to file a pro se PDR. He states that this failure deprived him of the opportunity to file a PDR.
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Smith v. Robbins, 528 2
U.S. 259 (2000); Ex parte Miller, 330 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009). Further, the current
record supports a sua sponte laches inquiry. Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial
court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The
trial court shall order appellate counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. The court shall also give
Applicant an opportunity to explain his delay. In developing the record, the trial court may use any
means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine
whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the
trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art.
26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of
counsel’s name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether appellate
counsel’s performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The court shall also make
findings and conclusions as to whether laches bars Applicant’s request for relief. The trial court may
make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claim.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: September 16, 2020 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rios, Abel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rios-abel-texcrimapp-2020.