Riordan v. Peoples Savings Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Riordan v. Peoples Savings Bank

258 A.D. 904, 16 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7520

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 11, 1939·Published

Opinion

Order of the City Court of Yonkers, dismissing complaint as against respondent Stancs, and judgment entered thereon, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to respondents to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. The second cause of action in the amended complaint is sufficient (Ochs v. Woods, 221 N. Y. 335); so also is the third cause of action. (Hornstein v. Podwitz, 254 id. 443.) There is no misjoinder of parties defendant. (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 211, 212.) Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the City Court of Yonkers, dismissing complaint as against respondent Stancs, and judgment entered thereon, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to respondents to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. The second cause of action in the amended complaint is sufficient (Ochs v. Woods, 221 N. Y. 335); so also is the third cause of action. (Hornstein v. Podwitz, 254 id. 443.) There is no misjoinder of parties defendant. (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 211, 212.) Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Riordan v. Peoples Savings Bank, 258 A.D. 904, 16 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7520 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

258 A.D. 904 (Riordan v. Peoples Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related