Riordan v. Peoples Savings Bank
This text of 258 A.D. 904 (Riordan v. Peoples Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order of the City Court of Yonkers, dismissing complaint as against respondent Stancs, and judgment entered thereon, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to respondents to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. The second cause of action in the amended complaint is sufficient (Ochs v. Woods, 221 N. Y. 335); so also is the third cause of action. (Hornstein v. Podwitz, 254 id. 443.) There is no misjoinder of parties defendant. (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 211, 212.) Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 A.D. 904, 16 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riordan-v-peoples-savings-bank-nyappdiv-1939.