Riordan v. Blenke

24 Mo. App. 357, 1887 Mo. App. LEXIS 193
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 18, 1887·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Rombahee, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

1'n this cause the plaintiff appealing has filed a formal assignment of errors, as required by Revised Statutes, section 3764, but has failed to file a statement and brief as required by section 3773 and by the rules of this court. It is discretionary on our part, in such a case, under rule nineteen of this court, to continue or re-set the cause, or dismiss the appeal. A detailed examination of the record satisfies 'me that a proper exercise of that discretion in this instance demands a dismissal of the appeal. My associates are of opinion that that is the proper disposition of the cause without such examination.

In the result we all concur. The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riordan v. Blenke, 24 Mo. App. 357, 1887 Mo. App. LEXIS 193 (Mo. Ct. App. 1887).

24 Mo. App. 357 (Riordan v. Blenke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Kansas City Light & Power Co. v. Trimble
237 S.W. 1021 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1922)