Rion v. Trujillo

289 S.W.3d 790, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 791, 2009 WL 1590919
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 9, 2009·No. ED 92167·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Geronimo Trujillo appeals from the motion court's denial of his Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment Pursuant to Rule 74.05(d) after the trial court entered a Judgment in Default against him in a property damage claim filed by Marshall Rion. We find the motion court did not abuse its discretion in denying Appellant's motion and affirm the motion eourt's ruling.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rion v. Trujillo, 289 S.W.3d 790, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 791, 2009 WL 1590919 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

289 S.W.3d 790 (Rion v. Trujillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fisk v. Fisk
289 S.W.3d 790 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)