Riojas, Ex Parte Oscar Eduardo
This text of Riojas, Ex Parte Oscar Eduardo (Riojas, Ex Parte Oscar Eduardo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,893
EX PARTE OSCAR EDUARDO RIOJAS, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 2010-CRR-572-D3 IN THE 341ST DISTRICT COURT FROM WEBB COUNTY
Per curiam.
OPINION
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of robbery and was
sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal the conviction.
The writ record shows that Applicant pleaded guilty under a plea agreement in exchange for
the State’s recommendation of a five-year sentence with credit for eighteen months. The trial court
sentenced Applicant to the five years agreed upon and awarded pre-sentence jail-time credit from
the date of the offense to the date of sentencing, which amounts to five months and twenty-two days, -2-
but it could not award credit for the entire eighteen months agreed upon because the additional time
to have been credited was never served in connection with this offense. Applicant complains his
guilty plea was therefore involuntary because the plea agreement was not enforceable regarding the
amount of time to be credited against the five-year sentence.
This Court has held that a plea is involuntary where the provisions of the plea agreement or
bargain are unenforceable, and this is true even though the State or the trial court never had the
authority to ensure compliance with the plea agreement. Ex parte Austin, 746 S.W.2d 226, 227-229
(Tex.Crim.App. 1988). The appropriate relief in such a situation is either specific enforcement of
the agreement or withdrawal of the plea, depending upon the circumstances of the case. Id. Because
Applicant cannot be awarded pre-sentence jail-time credit that would extend to a date before the date
the offense was committed, see Ex parte Hayward, 711 S.W.2d 652, 656 (Tex.Crim.App. 1986), the
appropriate remedy is to permit Applicant to withdraw his guilty plea.
Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 2010-CRR-572-D3 in the 341st District Court
of Webb County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Webb
County to answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any necessary
bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.
Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional
Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.
Delivered: October 10, 2012 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Riojas, Ex Parte Oscar Eduardo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riojas-ex-parte-oscar-eduardo-texcrimapp-2012.