Rio Tinto PLC v. Sarei

Supreme Court

Rio Tinto PLC v. Sarei

569 U.S. 945, 185 L. Ed. 2d 863, 133 S. Ct. 1995, 81 U.S.L.W. 3598, 2013 WL 1704704, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 3271

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedApril 22, 2013

DocketNo. 11–649.

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 569 U.S. 945 (Rio Tinto PLC v. Sarei) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rio Tinto PLC v. Sarei, 569 U.S. 945, 185 L. Ed. 2d 863, 133 S. Ct. 1995, 81 U.S.L.W. 3598, 2013 WL 1704704, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 3271 (2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion of Government of Australia, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of Professors of International Law, Foreign Relations Law and Federal Jurisdiction for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of Washington Legal Foundation, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Motion of National Foreign Trade Council, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 569 U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 1659, 185 L.Ed.2d 671 (2013).

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions and this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of Government of Australia, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of Professors of International Law, Foreign Relations Law and Federal Jurisdiction for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of Washington Legal Foundation, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Motion of National Foreign Trade Council, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 569 U.S. ----, 133 S.Ct. 1659, 185 L.Ed.2d 671 (2013).

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions and this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

569 U.S. 945, 185 L. Ed. 2d 863, 133 S. Ct. 1995, 81 U.S.L.W. 3598, 2013 WL 1704704, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 3271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rio-tinto-plc-v-sarei-scotus-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack