Rio Props., Llc Vs. Dist. Ct. (Harris)
This text of Rio Props., Llc Vs. Dist. Ct. (Harris) (Rio Props., Llc Vs. Dist. Ct. (Harris)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE 'STATE OF NEVADA
RIO PROPERTIES, LLC, D/B/A RIO No. 83647 HOTEL AND CASINO, Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE NOV 1 0 2021 GLORIA STURMAN, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and JEFFREY HARRIS, AN INDIVIDUAL, Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION
This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order denying, without prejudice, a motion for summary judgment or to dismiss based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Generally, this court will not consider writ petitions challenging district court orders denying motions for summary judgment or to dismiss. Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 113 N9v. 1343, 1344-45, 950 P.2d 280, 281 (1997). Moreover, we have recognized that petitions for writ relief should not be utilized as a vehicle for piecemeal appellate review. See W Cab Co. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 133 Nev. 65, 67, 390 P.3d 662, 667 (2017). For this reason, an appeal is generally considered an adequate legal
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(Of 1947A .tW!... 322.8S- remedy precluding writ relief. Pan u. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004); see NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330. Here, trial is imminent, and petitioners have an adequate legal remedy in the form of an appeal from the final judgment. NRAP 3A(b)(1). Thus, we decline to consider this petition for extraordinary writ relief, NRAP 21(b); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 818 P.2d 849 (1991), and we ORDER the petition DENIED.'
Cadish C4/A , J.
Herndon
cc: Hon. Gloria Sturman, District Judge Brandon Smerber Law Firm Titolo Law Office Eighth District Court Clerk
lIn light of this order, petitioner's emergency motion for stay is denied as moot. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
OA 1947A esfac. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rio Props., Llc Vs. Dist. Ct. (Harris), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rio-props-llc-vs-dist-ct-harris-nev-2021.