Rio Miami Corp. v. Balbuena

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rio Miami Corp. v. Balbuena

756 So. 2d 258, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5256, 2000 WL 525830

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 3, 2000

DocketNo. 3D98-3296

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 756 So. 2d 258 (Rio Miami Corp. v. Balbuena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rio Miami Corp. v. Balbuena, 756 So. 2d 258, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5256, 2000 WL 525830 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred in granting the plaintiff/appellee’s motion to reinstate maintenance and cure because contradicting medical evidence existed which indicated the plaintiffiappellee had not reached maximum medical improvement. See Langmead v. Admiral Cruises, Inc., 610 So.2d 565 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Quarrel v. Minervini, 510 So.2d 977 (Fla. 3d DCA [259]*2591987), review denied, 519 So.2d 987 (Fla.1988).

Accordingly, the order below is reversed and the case is remanded with instructions to send the issue to the jury: See Hendricks v. Dailey, 208 So.2d 101 (Fla.1968); Quarrel v. Minervini, 510 So.2d at 977.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred in granting the plaintiff/appellee’s motion to reinstate maintenance and cure because contradicting medical evidence existed which indicated the plaintiffiappellee had not reached maximum medical improvement. See Langmead v. Admiral Cruises, Inc., 610 So.2d 565 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Quarrel v. Minervini, 510 So.2d 977 (Fla. 3d DCA [259]*2591987), review denied, 519 So.2d 987 (Fla.1988).

Accordingly, the order below is reversed and the case is remanded with instructions to send the issue to the jury: See Hendricks v. Dailey, 208 So.2d 101 (Fla.1968); Quarrel v. Minervini, 510 So.2d at 977.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

756 So. 2d 258, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5256, 2000 WL 525830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rio-miami-corp-v-balbuena-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack