Rio Grande Western Railway Co. v. Chamberlin

4 Colo. App. 149
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 15, 1893
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Colo. App. 149 (Rio Grande Western Railway Co. v. Chamberlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Colorado Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rio Grande Western Railway Co. v. Chamberlin, 4 Colo. App. 149 (Colo. Ct. App. 1893).

Opinion

Thomson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Chamberlin, the plaintiff below, recovered a judgment of $80.00 against the defendant company for killing a cow worth $40.00. The recovery was had under our stock-killing stat[150]*150ute, which has been repeatedly held by the supreme court and this court to be unconstitutional. Wadsworth v. Railway Co., 18 Colo. 600; Railway Co. v. Outcalt, 2 Colo. App. 395; Railway Co. v. Vaughn, 3 Colo. App. 465. Upon proof that the animal was killed through the negligence of the defendant, plaintiff would be entitled to judgment for its value, and no more; and, if the cause is tried again, such proof must be forthcoming, or the plaintiff’s case must fail. The judgment is reversed.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wadsworth v. Union Pacific Ry. Co.
18 Colo. 600 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Colo. App. 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rio-grande-western-railway-co-v-chamberlin-coloctapp-1893.