Rinzler v. Rinzler
This text of 238 A.D. 798 (Rinzler v. Rinzler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence reversed on the law and the facts and motion granted, costs to abide the event. Interlocutory judgment as amended and final judgment vacated and the appeal therefrom dismissed in conformity with the decision on the appeal from the order. The testimony in the supplementary proceedings establishes, if taken at its face, that no one was indebted to plaintiff and that he had no claim against any one at the time this action was brought. On a new trial it can be determined whether that was true (in which event the plaintiff should fail), and if false, the effect thereof on his testimony. Kapper, Carswell, Seudder and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
238 A.D. 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rinzler-v-rinzler-nyappdiv-1933.