Rinzler v. Akin

87 S.E.2d 64, 211 Ga. 530, 1955 Ga. LEXIS 378
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 11, 1955·No. 18901·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Head, Justice.

The petition in the present case stated a cause of action „ for injunctive relief against the maintenance of a continuing nuisance, and the trial judge erred in sustaining the general demurrer to the petition. Rinzler v. Folsom, 209 Ga. 549 (74 S. E. 2d 661), and cases cited; Levin v. Myers, 211 Ga. 474 (86 S. E. 2d 283).

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. Cohen, Roberts & Kohler, for plaintiff in error. Barrett & Hayes, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rinzler v. Akin, 87 S.E.2d 64, 211 Ga. 530, 1955 Ga. LEXIS 378 (Ga. 1955).

87 S.E.2d 64 (Rinzler v. Akin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morris v. Cummings
116 S.E.2d 592 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1960)