Ringwood Co. v. Township of West Milford

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Ringwood Co. v. Township of West Milford

82 A. 867, 82 N.J.L. 741, 53 Vroom 741, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 298

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedMarch 5, 1912

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 82 A. 867 (Ringwood Co. v. Township of West Milford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ringwood Co. v. Township of West Milford, 82 A. 867, 82 N.J.L. 741, 53 Vroom 741, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 298 (N.J. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There being evidence to support the findings of the Supreme .-Court as to the fact of notice and of laches on the part of the plaintiff in error, the judgment of that court is affirmed for the reasons stated in the foregoing opinion.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Voorhees, Kalisch, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Congdon, White, Treacy, JJ. ' 14.

For reversal—None. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

There being evidence to support the findings of the Supreme .-Court as to the fact of notice and of laches on the part of the plaintiff in error, the judgment of that court is affirmed for the reasons stated in the foregoing opinion.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Voorhees, Kalisch, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Congdon, White, Treacy, JJ. ' 14.

For reversal—None. ■

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 A. 867, 82 N.J.L. 741, 53 Vroom 741, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ringwood-co-v-township-of-west-milford-nj-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack