Ringold v. State

472 A.2d 475, 299 Md. 79, 1984 Md. LEXIS 251
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided March 15, 1984·No. No. 17·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

It is this 15th day of March, 1984

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, affirmed with costs. See State v. Frazier, 298 Md. 422, 470 A.2d 1269 (1984).

DAVIDSON, J., would reverse for the reasons set forth in her dissenting opinion in State v. Frazier, 298 Md. 422, 464, 470 A.2d 1269, 1291 (1984).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ringold v. State, 472 A.2d 475, 299 Md. 79, 1984 Md. LEXIS 251 (Md. 1984).

472 A.2d 475 (Ringold v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Frazier
470 A.2d 1269 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1984)