Ringo v. Roper
766 F.3d 884, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17433, 2014 WL 4467811
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 9, 2014
DocketNo. 14-3044
StatusPublished
This text of 766 F.3d 884 (Ringo v. Roper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ringo v. Roper, 766 F.3d 884, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17433, 2014 WL 4467811 (8th Cir. 2014).
Opinion
ORDER
The petition for rehearing en banc is denied. The petition for rehearing by the panel is also denied. Judge Bye would grant the petition for en banc rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
766 F.3d 884, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17433, 2014 WL 4467811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ringo-v-roper-ca8-2014.