Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. Acme Cirous Operating Co.
13 A.D.2d 653, 218 N.Y.S.2d 494, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11230
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 27, 1961
StatusPublished
This text of 13 A.D.2d 653 (Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. Acme Cirous Operating Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. Acme Cirous Operating Co., 13 A.D.2d 653, 218 N.Y.S.2d 494, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11230 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).
Opinion
Motion for a stay dismissed, the appeal having become moot by the resettlement of the order appealed from and the taking of a new appeal from the resettled order. Motion for a stay denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
13 A.D.2d 653, 218 N.Y.S.2d 494, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ringling-bros-barnum-bailey-combined-shows-inc-v-acme-cirous-nyappdiv-1961.