Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. Acme Circus Operating Co.

12 A.D.2d 894, 214 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12898

This text of 12 A.D.2d 894 (Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. Acme Circus Operating Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. Acme Circus Operating Co., 12 A.D.2d 894, 214 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinion

Resettled order, entered on December 15, 1960, as denies defendants’ motion to vacate or modify plaintiff’s notices of examination of the defendants before trial, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Settle order on notice fixing date for examination to proceed. Appeal from [895]*895order, entered on December 13, 1960, denying defendants’ motion to vacate or modify plaintiff’s notices of examination of defendants before trial, unanimously dismissed, without costs. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 A.D.2d 894, 214 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ringling-bros-barnum-bailey-combined-shows-inc-v-acme-circus-nyappdiv-1961.