Ringgold v. Lewis

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Ringgold v. Lewis

20 F. Cas. 816, 3 D.C. 367, 3 Cranch 367

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedDecember 15, 1828

StatusPublished

This text of 20 F. Cas. 816 (Ringgold v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ringgold v. Lewis, 20 F. Cas. 816, 3 D.C. 367, 3 Cranch 367 (circtddc 1828).

Pincite

Opinion

The CoijRT (MoeSell, J., contra■,) was of opinion that the marshal was not entitled to poundage on the bank notes, being of opinion, from his return, that if they could lawfully be taken, (of which they doubted,) they were not taken into his actual custody so as to make himself chargeable therefor ; but that from the return it appears that he attached only the money and banknotes standing to the credit of TSF. Farrow in the bank.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The CoijRT (MoeSell, J., contra■,) was of opinion that the marshal was not entitled to poundage on the bank notes, being of opinion, from his return, that if they could lawfully be taken, (of which they doubted,) they were not taken into his actual custody so as to make himself chargeable therefor ; but that from the return it appears that he attached only the money and banknotes standing to the credit of TSF. Farrow in the bank.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 F. Cas. 816, 3 D.C. 367, 3 Cranch 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ringgold-v-lewis-circtddc-1828.