Ringgold v. Borough of Collingswood

426 U.S. 901, 96 S. Ct. 2220
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 1, 1976·No. No. 74-1335·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Appeal from Sup. Ct. N. J. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Marshall, and Mr. Justice Blackmun would vacate judgment and remand case for further consideration in light of Hynes v. Mayor of Borough of Oradell, 425 U. S. 610 (1976). Mr. Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ringgold v. Borough of Collingswood, 426 U.S. 901, 96 S. Ct. 2220 (1976).

426 U.S. 901 (Ringgold v. Borough of Collingswood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Russo
745 A.2d 540 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2000)
Robbiani v. Burke
390 A.2d 1149 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1978)
New Jersey State Chamber of Commerce v. New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission
382 A.2d 670 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)
Frazier v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
374 A.2d 1259 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)
State v. Kowitski
367 A.2d 459 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)