Ringgold County Savings Bank of Kellerton v. Miller

Eighth Circuit

Ringgold County Savings Bank of Kellerton v. Miller

33 F.2d 900, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2861

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJune 13, 1929

DocketNo. 8484

StatusPublished

This text of 33 F.2d 900 (Ringgold County Savings Bank of Kellerton v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ringgold County Savings Bank of Kellerton v. Miller, 33 F.2d 900, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2861 (8th Cir. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This ease involves the same legal question as is presented in No. 8483, S. Hooker v. R. E. Miller, Trustee, Estate of Thomas H. Hagerty, Bankrupt (C. C. A.) 33 F.(2d) 900 (opinion this day filed), i. [901]*901e., the sufficiency of the acknowledgments of two chattel mortgages duly recorded in the office of the recorder of deeds of Decatur county, Iowa. The referee in bankruptcy held the chattel mortgages void as against the trustee on account of the acknowledgments not being in conformity with the Iowa law as interpreted in Re Branson (D. C.) 17 F.(2d) 377. The trial judge approved the holding of the referee. This appeal followed. Under the authority of Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. Wagner (C. C. A.) 29 F.(2d) 984, the acknowledgments of the chattel mortgages here in question are valid, and the order of the District Judge affirming the report of the referee in bankruptcy must be set aside, and the case remanded for proceedings in harmony with the decision of. this court in Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. Wagner, supra. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This ease involves the same legal question as is presented in No. 8483, S. Hooker v. R. E. Miller, Trustee, Estate of Thomas H. Hagerty, Bankrupt (C. C. A.) 33 F.(2d) 900 (opinion this day filed), i. [901]*901e., the sufficiency of the acknowledgments of two chattel mortgages duly recorded in the office of the recorder of deeds of Decatur county, Iowa. The referee in bankruptcy held the chattel mortgages void as against the trustee on account of the acknowledgments not being in conformity with the Iowa law as interpreted in Re Branson (D. C.) 17 F.(2d) 377. The trial judge approved the holding of the referee. This appeal followed. Under the authority of Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. Wagner (C. C. A.) 29 F.(2d) 984, the acknowledgments of the chattel mortgages here in question are valid, and the order of the District Judge affirming the report of the referee in bankruptcy must be set aside, and the case remanded for proceedings in harmony with the decision of. this court in Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. Wagner, supra. It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 F.2d 900, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ringgold-county-savings-bank-of-kellerton-v-miller-ca8-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack