Ringgold Co. v. Ross

40 Iowa 176
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided December 24, 1874·Published

Opinion

Day, J.

The first error assigned needs not, in the state of the record, be considered. The bond was forfeited on the first day of the term, before an indictment had been found, and because of the failure of defendant to appear and challenge the grand jury. The forfeiture'was premature. The defendant had the privilege of appearing and objecting to the grand j ury, but he was under no obligation to do so.

The bond could be forfeited only for a failure to appear when his presence was lawfully required. The State of Iowa v. Klingman, 14 Iowa, 404.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ringgold Co. v. Ross, 40 Iowa 176 (iowa 1874).

40 Iowa 176 (Ringgold Co. v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Klingman
14 Iowa 404 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1862)