Ringer v. State

394 So. 2d 72, 1981 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 2249
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ringer v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1980 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1306
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided January 20, 1981·No. 8 Div. 329·Published

Opinion

LEIGH M. CLARK, Retired Circuit Judge.

The Return to Remand, 394 So.2d 69, discloses that a hearing has been conducted by the trial court in which the testimony of the magistrate who issued the search warrant in this case was taken. He testified that he was not licensed to practice law. The Return to Remand was filed in this Court on December 15, 1980. It appears that neither party has filed a brief within the period provided in the last paragraph of our opinion. In accordance therewith, the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the causes remanded.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by Retired Circuit Judge Leigh M. Clark, serving as a judge of this Court under the provisions of § 6.10 of the Judicial Article (Constitutional Amendment No. 328); his opinion is hereby adopted as that of the Court.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ringer v. State, 394 So. 2d 72, 1981 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 2249 (Ala. Ct. App. 1981).

394 So. 2d 72 (Ringer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ringer v. State
394 So. 2d 69 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1980)