Ringer v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Ringer v. State

394 So. 2d 72, 1981 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 2249

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedJanuary 20, 1981

Docket8 Div. 329

StatusPublished

This text of 394 So. 2d 72 (Ringer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ringer v. State, 394 So. 2d 72, 1981 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 2249 (Ala. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

LEIGH M. CLARK, Retired Circuit Judge.

The Return to Remand, 394 So.2d 69, discloses that a hearing has been conducted by the trial court in which the testimony of the magistrate who issued the search warrant in this case was taken. He testified that he was not licensed to practice law. The Return to Remand was filed in this Court on December 15, 1980. It appears that neither party has filed a brief within the period provided in the last paragraph of our opinion. In accordance therewith, the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the causes remanded.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by Retired Circuit Judge Leigh M. Clark, serving as a judge of this Court under the provisions of § 6.10 of the Judicial Article (Constitutional Amendment No. 328); his opinion is hereby adopted as that of the Court.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LEIGH M. CLARK, Retired Circuit Judge.

The Return to Remand, 394 So.2d 69, discloses that a hearing has been conducted by the trial court in which the testimony of the magistrate who issued the search warrant in this case was taken. He testified that he was not licensed to practice law. The Return to Remand was filed in this Court on December 15, 1980. It appears that neither party has filed a brief within the period provided in the last paragraph of our opinion. In accordance therewith, the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the causes remanded.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by Retired Circuit Judge Leigh M. Clark, serving as a judge of this Court under the provisions of § 6.10 of the Judicial Article (Constitutional Amendment No. 328); his opinion is hereby adopted as that of the Court.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All the Judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

394 So. 2d 72, 1981 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 2249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ringer-v-state-alacrimapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack