Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Ring v. Ring

Ring v. Ring

251 A.D.2d 421, 672 N.Y.S.2d 821, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6588
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 8, 1998
StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D.2d 421 (Ring v. Ring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ring v. Ring, 251 A.D.2d 421, 672 N.Y.S.2d 821, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6588 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act § 651, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (McElligott, J.), entered May 13, 1997, which denied his applications for custody of the parties’ children and to hold the wife in contempt for her failure to obey prior orders of the court.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the father’s contention, the court’s determination on custody comports with what is in the children’s best interests considering the circumstances of this case and the parties (see, Matter of Tropea v Tropea, 87 NY2d 727; Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 171; Friederwitzer v Friederwitzer, 55 NY2d 89, 93; Coryell P. v Louis J. P., 231 AD2d 701).

The father’s remaining contention is without merit. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MATTER OF TROPEA v. Tropea
665 N.E.2d 145 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
Friederwitzer v. Friederwitzer
432 N.E.2d 765 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Eschbach v. Eschbach
436 N.E.2d 1260 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Coryell P. v. Louis J. P.
231 A.D.2d 701 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 A.D.2d 421, 672 N.Y.S.2d 821, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ring-v-ring-nyappdiv-1998.