Ring v. Mott

2 Sandf. 683
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedJanuary 26, 1850
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 Sandf. 683 (Ring v. Mott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ring v. Mott, 2 Sandf. 683 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1850).

Opinion

By the Court.

The issuing of a commission is in the discretion of the -court It is usually done as of course, with or [684]*684without a stay of proceedings, but it is not a matter of strict right. • The court must be governed in the exercise of its discretion, by what it is apparent will be the consequences'; and if it is evident that great injustice will be likely to ensue to the adverse party, it is far from being of course to grant it. In such a case, the court will either impose terms so as to preserve the rights of the adverse party, or will even refuse it, if no way for their protection can be devised.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keenan v. O'Brien
23 Abb. N. Cas. 63 (New York Supreme Court, 1889)
McColl v. Sun Mutual Insurance Co.
44 How. Pr. 452 (New York Court of Appeals, 1872)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Sandf. 683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ring-v-mott-nysuperctnyc-1850.