Ring Power Corp. v. Oil Screw Tug "Snipe"
This text of 479 F.2d 1322 (Ring Power Corp. v. Oil Screw Tug "Snipe") is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal stems from the recognition of a maritime lien on the Oil Screw Tug “Snipe” in favor of Ring Power Corporation by the district court for the Middle District of Florida sitting in admiralty without a jury. The owners of the “Snipe” appeal. We affirm.
The basic question in this appeal is whether or not the evidence was sufficient to establish that the true owners of the tug, Transportation Equipment Leasing Corporation, authorized certain repairs to the vessel and waived a “no lien” provision in its contract with the charterer so as to create a lien under 46 U.S.C. § 971.
The court found that TEL had authorized the repairs, either expressly or implicitly through its actions. There is ample evidence to support this finding. We agree with the language of an earlier opinion from this circuit dealing with this same problem of authorization in which the court stated:
Consequently we think this case — a swearing match between live swearers whose credibility had to be, and was, [1323]*1323resolved by the Judge — must end with the trial Court since these findings were not clearly erroneous, (citations omitted) Yacht, Mary Jane v. Broward Marine, Inc., 5 Cir. 1963, 313 F.2d 516, 517.
Therefore, the judgment of the district court in this cause is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
479 F.2d 1322, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ring-power-corp-v-oil-screw-tug-snipe-ca5-1973.