Ring Engineering Co. v. Otis Elevator Co.

D.C. Circuit

Ring Engineering Co. v. Otis Elevator Co.

179 F.2d 812, 86 U.S. App. D.C. 411

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJanuary 23, 1950

Docket10116

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 179 F.2d 812 (Ring Engineering Co. v. Otis Elevator Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ring Engineering Co. v. Otis Elevator Co., 179 F.2d 812, 86 U.S. App. D.C. 411 (D.C. Cir. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case involves interpretation of a contract for installing elevators in an office building in Washington, D. C. We agree with the District Court’s interpretation. Furthermore, appellant may not overturn a summary judgment by raising here an issue of fact that was not plainly disclosed as a genuine issue in the trial court. Fletcher v. Krise, 73 App.D.C. 266, 120 F.2d 809; Williams v. Kolb, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 253, 145 F.2d 344. Garrett Biblical Institute v. American University, 82 U.S.App.D.C., 265, 163 F.2d 265, is not to the contrary.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case involves interpretation of a contract for installing elevators in an office building in Washington, D. C. We agree with the District Court’s interpretation. Furthermore, appellant may not overturn a summary judgment by raising here an issue of fact that was not plainly disclosed as a genuine issue in the trial court. Fletcher v. Krise, 73 App.D.C. 266, 120 F.2d 809; Williams v. Kolb, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 253, 145 F.2d 344. Garrett Biblical Institute v. American University, 82 U.S.App.D.C., 265, 163 F.2d 265, is not to the contrary.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 F.2d 812, 86 U.S. App. D.C. 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ring-engineering-co-v-otis-elevator-co-cadc-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack