Riner v. State

176 So. 38, 179 So. 404, 131 Fla. 243, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1423
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 11, 1938·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Court having heretofore granted a Petition for Rehearing to the Plaintiff in Error, E. D. Tison, and having further, considered the cause upon the Transcript of the Record of the judgment of the Circuit Court and upon additional briefs .and argument submitted upon the rehearing, and being now fully advised in the premises, it is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the judgment entered herein by this Court on July 29, 1937, *244 affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court, should be and is now hereby reaffirmed, and it is so ordered.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riner v. State, 176 So. 38, 179 So. 404, 131 Fla. 243, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1423 (Fla. 1938).

176 So. 38 (Riner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edwards v. State
302 So. 2d 479 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Roberts v. State
164 So. 2d 817 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1964)
State v. Brown
118 So. 2d 574 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Killen v. State
92 So. 2d 825 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)
Wallendorf v. New York Life Insurance Co.
12 So. 2d 585 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1943)
North Miami v. Seaway Corporation
9 So. 2d 705 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1942)