Riner v. State
1 So. 2d 403, 241 Ala. 166, 1941 Ala. LEXIS 335
This text of 1 So. 2d 403 (Riner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Riner v. State, 1 So. 2d 403, 241 Ala. 166, 1941 Ala. LEXIS 335 (Ala. 1941).
Opinion
The defendant on his trial, though represented by counsel, failed to reserve any question of law for review on appeal, and the Court of Appeals, pretermits consideration of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the charge, and correctly so. McPherson v. State, 198 Ala. 5, 73 So. 387.
The writ of certiorari is therefore denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hammond v. State
502 So. 2d 843 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Atkins v. State
497 So. 2d 598 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Conway v. State
489 So. 2d 641 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Stone v. State
13 So. 2d 434 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1943)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 So. 2d 403, 241 Ala. 166, 1941 Ala. LEXIS 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/riner-v-state-ala-1941.