Riner v. State

1 So. 2d 403, 241 Ala. 166, 1941 Ala. LEXIS 335
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided March 20, 1941·No. 8 Div. 105.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

BROWN, Justice.

The defendant on his trial, though represented by counsel, failed to reserve any question of law for review on appeal, and the Court of Appeals, pretermits consideration of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the charge, and correctly so. McPherson v. State, 198 Ala. 5, 73 So. 387.

The writ of certiorari is therefore denied.

GARDNER, C. J., and THOMAS and FOSTER, JJ., conchr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riner v. State, 1 So. 2d 403, 241 Ala. 166, 1941 Ala. LEXIS 335 (Ala. 1941).

1 So. 2d 403 (Riner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hammond v. State
502 So. 2d 843 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Atkins v. State
497 So. 2d 598 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Conway v. State
489 So. 2d 641 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Stone v. State
13 So. 2d 434 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1943)