Rinehart v. State

123 S.E. 925, 32 Ga. App. 549, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 544
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedAugust 8, 1924
Docket15725
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 123 S.E. 925 (Rinehart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rinehart v. State, 123 S.E. 925, 32 Ga. App. 549, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 544 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

The accused was convicted of being in an intoxicated condition upon a public highway. The evidence failed to show that his intoxication “was then and there made manifest by boisterous and by indecent condition and acting,' and by the use of vulgar, profane and unbecoming- language, and loud and violent discourse,” as charged in the indictment. The verdict of guilty, therefore, was unauthorized and the court erred in refusing the grant of a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodnoorth, JJ., concur. J. M. Bellah, for plaintiff in error,

cited :• 13 Ga. App. 71; 25 Ga. App. 425.

JS. 8. Taylor, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. State
63 S.E.2d 63 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 S.E. 925, 32 Ga. App. 549, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rinehart-v-state-gactapp-1924.