Rinehart v. State
This text of 123 S.E. 925 (Rinehart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The accused was convicted of being in an intoxicated condition upon a public highway. The evidence failed to show that his intoxication “was then and there made manifest by boisterous and by indecent condition and acting,' and by the use of vulgar, profane and unbecoming- language, and loud and violent discourse,” as charged in the indictment. The verdict of guilty, therefore, was unauthorized and the court erred in refusing the grant of a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
cited :• 13 Ga. App. 71; 25 Ga. App. 425.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
123 S.E. 925, 32 Ga. App. 549, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rinehart-v-state-gactapp-1924.