Rinehart v. State
123 S.E. 925, 32 Ga. App. 549, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 544
Opinion
The accused was convicted of being in an intoxicated condition upon a public highway. The evidence failed to show that his intoxication “was then and there made manifest by boisterous and by indecent condition and acting,' and by the use of vulgar, profane and unbecoming- language, and loud and violent discourse,” as charged in the indictment. The verdict of guilty, therefore, was unauthorized and the court erred in refusing the grant of a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
cited :• 13 Ga. App. 71; 25 Ga. App. 425.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rinehart v. State, 123 S.E. 925, 32 Ga. App. 549, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 544 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).
123 S.E. 925 (Rinehart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moore v. State
63 S.E.2d 63 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)