Rindfleisch v. Bayly
This text of 242 A.D. 797 (Rindfleisch v. Bayly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment [798]*798reversed on the law, with costs, certiorari proceeding dismissed and the determination of the board of appeals of the village of Mamaroneek reinstated and confirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In our opinion, the evidence did not justify the court in reversing the determination of the board of appeals. (People ex rel. St. Albans-S. Corp. v. Connell, 257 N. Y. 73; People ex rel. Arseekay Syndicate v. Murdock, 265 id. 158.) Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent with this decision are reversed and new findings and conclusions will be made. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Davis, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 A.D. 797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rindfleisch-v-bayly-nyappdiv-1934.