Rinchey v. Stryker

New York Court of Appeals

Rinchey v. Stryker

31 N.Y. 140

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 15, 1865

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 31 N.Y. 140 (Rinchey v. Stryker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rinchey v. Stryker, 31 N.Y. 140 (N.Y. 1865).

Pincite

Opinion

The court were of the opinion that the sheriff was entitled to defend, on the ground that the goods seized were the prop-" erty of Cartwright and Hazzard, who had disposed of the same with intent to defraud, &c., then* creditors, and that the plaintiff, in receiving the property, had notice of the fraudulent intent, &c.

The case is reported at length in 26 How. Pr., p. 75. The opinion was written by Balcom, J., in which all concurred, except Emott, J., who-did not vote.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court were of the opinion that the sheriff was entitled to defend, on the ground that the goods seized were the prop-" erty of Cartwright and Hazzard, who had disposed of the same with intent to defraud, &c., then* creditors, and that the plaintiff, in receiving the property, had notice of the fraudulent intent, &c.

The case is reported at length in 26 How. Pr., p. 75. The opinion was written by Balcom, J., in which all concurred, except Emott, J., who-did not vote.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 N.Y. 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rinchey-v-stryker-ny-1865.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack