Rimoldi Sportswear, Inc. v. Devlin
This text of 297 N.E.2d 74 (Rimoldi Sportswear, Inc. v. Devlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As there was no evidence to warrant a finding that the assignment of accounts receivable made by the defendant in this case was one falling within the provisions of G. L. c. 106, § 9-104(f), or within those of G. L. c. 106, § 9-302(l)(e), and as there was no evidence to warrant a finding that any financing statement with respect to such assignment had been filed in the manner required by G. L. c. 106, §§ 9-401, et seq., the plaintiff, as a “lien creditor” (G. L. c. 106, § 9-301[3]), was entitled to [833]*833prevail over the prior assignment of the accounts to the intervener. G. L. c. 106, § 9-301(l)(b).
Order dismissing report affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
297 N.E.2d 74, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 832, 1973 Mass. App. LEXIS 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rimoldi-sportswear-inc-v-devlin-massappct-1973.