Rimoldi Sportswear, Inc. v. Devlin

297 N.E.2d 74, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 832, 1973 Mass. App. LEXIS 576
Massachusetts Appeals Court·Decided June 20, 1973·Published

Opinion

As there was no evidence to warrant a finding that the assignment of accounts receivable made by the defendant in this case was one falling within the provisions of G. L. c. 106, § 9-104(f), or within those of G. L. c. 106, § 9-302(l)(e), and as there was no evidence to warrant a finding that any financing statement with respect to such assignment had been filed in the manner required by G. L. c. 106, §§ 9-401, et seq., the plaintiff, as a “lien creditor” (G. L. c. 106, § 9-301[3]), was entitled to [833]*833prevail over the prior assignment of the accounts to the intervener. G. L. c. 106, § 9-301(l)(b).

Robert J. Moses (Michael L. Pappas with him) for Peters Fabrics, Inc., intervener. Michael Carchia, Jr., for Rimoldi Sportswear, Inc.

Order dismissing report affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rimoldi Sportswear, Inc. v. Devlin, 297 N.E.2d 74, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 832, 1973 Mass. App. LEXIS 576 (Mass. Ct. App. 1973).

297 N.E.2d 74 (Rimoldi Sportswear, Inc. v. Devlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 9-104
Massachusetts § 9-104(f)
§ 9-301
Massachusetts § 9-301
§ 9-302
Massachusetts § 9-302(l)(e)
§ 9-401
Massachusetts § 9-401