Rimmer v. CitiFinancial, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Rimmer v. CitiFinancial, Inc.

894 N.E.2d 331, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1471

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rimmer v. CitiFinancial, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Ohio 4902 →

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 1, 2008·No. 2008-1144·Published

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 89407, 2008-0hio-1814. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. IV and V; cause held for the decision in 2008-0905, Alexander v. Wells Fargo Financial Ohio 1, Ltd., Cuyahoga App. No. 89277, 2008-0hio-1402; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. Ill without holding. Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., would also accept the appeal on all other Propositions of Law. Pfeifer, O’Connor, and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 89407, 2008-0hio-1814. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. IV and V; cause held for the decision in 2008-0905, Alexander v. Wells Fargo Financial Ohio 1, Ltd., Cuyahoga App. No. 89277, 2008-0hio-1402; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. Ill without holding. Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., would also accept the appeal on all other Propositions of Law. Pfeifer, O’Connor, and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Rimmer v. CitiFinancial, Inc., 894 N.E.2d 331, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1471 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

894 N.E.2d 331 (Rimmer v. CitiFinancial, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.