Rimmer v. CitiFinancial, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Rimmer v. CitiFinancial, Inc.

894 N.E.2d 331, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1471

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 1, 2008

Docket2008-1144

StatusPublished

This text of 894 N.E.2d 331 (Rimmer v. CitiFinancial, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rimmer v. CitiFinancial, Inc., 894 N.E.2d 331, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1471 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 89407, 2008-0hio-1814. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. IV and V; cause held for the decision in 2008-0905, Alexander v. Wells Fargo Financial Ohio 1, Ltd., Cuyahoga App. No. 89277, 2008-0hio-1402; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. Ill without holding. Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., would also accept the appeal on all other Propositions of Law. Pfeifer, O’Connor, and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 89407, 2008-0hio-1814. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. IV and V; cause held for the decision in 2008-0905, Alexander v. Wells Fargo Financial Ohio 1, Ltd., Cuyahoga App. No. 89277, 2008-0hio-1402; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. Ill without holding. Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., would also accept the appeal on all other Propositions of Law. Pfeifer, O’Connor, and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

894 N.E.2d 331, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rimmer-v-citifinancial-inc-ohio-2008.